Jennifer Clapp

Political Economy of Food, Agriculture and Environment

Competing axes of power in the global plastics treaty: Understanding the politics of progress and setbacks in negotiating a high-ambition agreement


Journal article


Peter Dauvergne, Jen Iris Allan, Simon Beaudoin, Bethanie M. Carney Almroth, Jennifer Clapp, Emily Cowan, Babet de Groot, Trisia Farrelly, N. Grilli, Alice Mah, Elizabeth Mendenhall, Rosetta Paik, Rob Ralston, Peter Stoett, Aleke Stöfen-O’Brien, John Y. Taggart, Rachel Tiller, Patricia Villarrubia-Gómez, Joanna Vince
Marine Policy, 2025

Semantic Scholar DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Dauvergne, P., Allan, J. I., Beaudoin, S., Almroth, B. M. C., Clapp, J., Cowan, E., … Vince, J. (2025). Competing axes of power in the global plastics treaty: Understanding the politics of progress and setbacks in negotiating a high-ambition agreement. Marine Policy.


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Dauvergne, Peter, Jen Iris Allan, Simon Beaudoin, Bethanie M. Carney Almroth, Jennifer Clapp, Emily Cowan, Babet de Groot, et al. “Competing Axes of Power in the Global Plastics Treaty: Understanding the Politics of Progress and Setbacks in Negotiating a High-Ambition Agreement.” Marine Policy (2025).


MLA   Click to copy
Dauvergne, Peter, et al. “Competing Axes of Power in the Global Plastics Treaty: Understanding the Politics of Progress and Setbacks in Negotiating a High-Ambition Agreement.” Marine Policy, 2025.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{peter2025a,
  title = {Competing axes of power in the global plastics treaty: Understanding the politics of progress and setbacks in negotiating a high-ambition agreement},
  year = {2025},
  journal = {Marine Policy},
  author = {Dauvergne, Peter and Allan, Jen Iris and Beaudoin, Simon and Almroth, Bethanie M. Carney and Clapp, Jennifer and Cowan, Emily and de Groot, Babet and Farrelly, Trisia and Grilli, N. and Mah, Alice and Mendenhall, Elizabeth and Paik, Rosetta and Ralston, Rob and Stoett, Peter and Stöfen-O’Brien, Aleke and Taggart, John Y. and Tiller, Rachel and Villarrubia-Gómez, Patricia and Vince, Joanna}
}

Abstract

of pro-plastics power – comprising loose alliances of petrostates and business interests profiting from rising plastics production – sought to thwart high-ambition obligations. Industry actors lobbied against stringent commitments and endeavored to narrow the treaty ’ s scope to downstream waste management. Petrostates such as Russia and Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, stalled discussions and bracketed high-ambition text. Divisions between developing and developed countries also emerged over the appropriate financing mechanism. Despite this turbulence, achieving a strong treaty remains possible. But this will require strengthening the high-ambition axis of power, enhancing transparency and accountability, and ensuring the meaningful inclusion of rights holders, local communities, and civil society.